Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02252
Original file (BC 2013 02252.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02252
		COUNSEL:  NONE
	XXXXXXX	HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Wilmington, Delaware to 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He has no living relatives, residences, or interests in the 
state of Delaware.  Pennsylvania is his place of birth, his 
father's residence, and where he plans on retiring.

His complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force.  Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings.

________________________________________________________________

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

DPSIPS recommends denial.  DPSIPS states that there is no error 
or injustice to justify a change to the applicant’s HOR.  Joint 
Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) Volume I, Appendix A, states in 
part that a HOR is the place recorded as the individual’s home 
when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered 
into a tour of active duty.  Any correction must be fully 
justified and the home, as corrected, must be the member’s 
actual home upon entering the Service, and not a different place 
selected for the member's convenience.   The Air Force Personnel 
Center Officer Accessions Branch confirmed that the applicant 
initialed the DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed 
Forces of the United States, dated 9 Jun 2009, listing 
Wilmington, Delaware as his HOR.

The complete DPSIPS evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit 
C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 6 Dec 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________



The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 20 Feb 2014, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2013-02252:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 May 2013.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIPS, dated 17 Oct 2013, w/atch. 
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 2013.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair
2


2





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01717

    Original file (BC 2013 01717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing the documentation presented and the applicant’s military personnel record, there is no evidence to warrant changing the applicant’s HOR. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). Applicant's Master Personnel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02440

    Original file (BC 2013 02440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPS recommends denial stating there is no error or injustice regarding the applicant’s HOR. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02600

    Original file (BC 2014 02600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to reflect San Antonio, Texas (TX). The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), volume 1, Appendix A1, part 1, dated 1 Feb 14, states the HOR is the place recorded as the individual’s home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04024

    Original file (BC 2013 04024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04024 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from 570 Ingman Court Marina, Monterey, California 93933 to 4021 Whittington Drive, Orlando, Florida 32817. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03724

    Original file (BC 2013 03724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03724 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from 11280 Chapel Street, Wayland, New York, 14572 to 1430 Tahoe Court, Lake Worth, Florida 33461. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. After a thorough review of his military personnel record and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01105

    Original file (BC 2014 01105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01105 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home Of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXXXXX to XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX, was his correct HOR and the place he resided for almost two years prior to commissioning at the University of XXXXXXXXXX Y, after graduating from Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC). While the Board notes the comment from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02186

    Original file (BC 2013 02186.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would like his home of record changed to reflect his Utah address. His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Albuquerque, New Mexico as his home of record at the time of his enlistment. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe his home of record or his place of entry currently reflected in his records were incorrectly recorded at the time he initially came on active duty.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01941

    Original file (BC 2014 01941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 12 Nov 14 for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02924

    Original file (BC 2014 02924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 7a (Place of Entry into Active Duty (PLEAD)) reflect Niceville, FL, rather than Tuscaloosa, AL. b. Item 7b (Home of Record (HOR) at Time of Entry) reflect Niceville, FL, rather than Clifton, VA. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00695

    Original file (BC 2014 00695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00695 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to reflect Hallandale Beach, Florida. His immediate family has a residence in Florida and it is this location both he and his spouse spend the majority of their time when visiting. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums...